# Difference between revisions of "Examples first"

From Learning

(→External links) |
|||

Line 7: | Line 7: | ||

* [http://gowers.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/my-favourite-pedagogical-principle-examples-first/ My favourite pedagogical principle: examples first!] by Tim Gowers | * [http://gowers.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/my-favourite-pedagogical-principle-examples-first/ My favourite pedagogical principle: examples first!] by Tim Gowers | ||

* [https://byorgey.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/abstraction-intuition-and-the-monad-tutorial-fallacy/ Abstraction, intuition, and the “monad tutorial fallacy”] by Brent Yorgey | * [https://byorgey.wordpress.com/2009/01/12/abstraction-intuition-and-the-monad-tutorial-fallacy/ Abstraction, intuition, and the “monad tutorial fallacy”] by Brent Yorgey | ||

+ | |||

+ | [[Category:Mathematics]] |

## Latest revision as of 20:15, 8 January 2019

## Definition

**Examples first** is a (controversial) pedagogical principle that states that a discussion of a few relevant examples should *precede* the formal definition (and perhaps in some cases the formal definition is not needed at all). This is in contrast with the more common pedagogical approach of define then discuss, *then* examples are presented or discussed to reinforce or clarify the definition.

## External links

- My favourite pedagogical principle: examples first! by Tim Gowers
- Abstraction, intuition, and the “monad tutorial fallacy” by Brent Yorgey