Learning from scattered resources: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I think maybe a lot of learning that happens in various subcultures is like this. As of 2019, I think learning how to use [[spaced repetition software]] is like this. | I think maybe a lot of learning that happens in various subcultures is like this. As of 2019, I think learning how to use [[spaced repetition software]] is like this. | ||
Various tricky things that can happen in this kind of learning: | |||
* there are multiple people giving little bits of info, and different people can have different opinions and can contradict each other | |||
* depending on the discipline, the majority of the people can be untrustworthy or unreliable in other ways | |||
* many topics are not explained well, and have to be pieced together by the [[learner]] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> |
Revision as of 02:46, 14 February 2019
By learning from scattered resources I mean the kind of learning that effective altruists or rationalists do to catch up on the state-of-the-art in EA/rationalist thinking, or the kind of learning that Duncan Sabien mentions of how he learned parkour: "Speaking as someone who pieced together the discipline of parkour back in 2003, from scattered terrible videos (pre Youtube) and a few internet comment boards—pulling together a cohesive and working practice from even the best writeups is a tremendously difficult task."[1]
This kind of learning, where one (1) actively goes searching for many resources (each of which contains only a small amount of information) and (2) receives relatively little feedback from people who know about the topic, seems different from the kind of learning that happens in other situations:
- in school or apprenticeships, there is usually a teacher/mentor or textbook that contains the vast majority of the information that is to be learned
- when learning on the job, there are again coworkers/bosses, but also there's constant feedback on job performance
I think maybe a lot of learning that happens in various subcultures is like this. As of 2019, I think learning how to use spaced repetition software is like this.
Various tricky things that can happen in this kind of learning:
- there are multiple people giving little bits of info, and different people can have different opinions and can contradict each other
- depending on the discipline, the majority of the people can be untrustworthy or unreliable in other ways
- many topics are not explained well, and have to be pieced together by the learner